Disposed

Shankarlal Jogi v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Rajasthan HC12 Mar 2018SOSA/296/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a bail application by recalling the matter to the Special Public Prosecutor based on the discrepancy in the accused's appearance and the fresh application filed by the SPP. The appellant was directed to appear before the Special Public Prosecutor on a specified date.

What did the court decide?

The bail application was disposed of; the appellant is directed to appear before the Special Public Prosecutor on 12-4-18 for a fresh hearing.

Shankarlal Jogi Vs Central Bureau of Investigation — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

S.B.Cri. Bail (SOS) Application No-296/18

¶2

¶3

jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqjA

¶4

%% vkns'k %%

¶5

S.B.Cri. Bail (SOS) Application No-296/18 In S.B.Criminal Appeal No-488/18

¶6

Shankarlal Jogi S/o Shri Prabhunath Jogi, Concurrent Auditor, Sbbj, Pawta And Jalori Gate, Jodhpur, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Village Charanwas Tehsil Phulera District Jaipur Presently R/o E-357, Murlipura Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.)

¶7

----Appellant

¶8

Versus

¶9

Central Bureau Of Investigation Through Its Special Pp.

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh

¶12

izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ ds vf/koDrk Jh vfuy mieu dh vksj ls vf/koDrk Jh v'kksd dqekj feJkA fof'k"B yksd vfHk;kstd lhchvkbZ Jh v'ouh dqekj 'kekZA

¶13

%% vkns'k fnukd %% 12-3-2018a

¶14

U;k;ky; }kjk %&

¶15

izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 389 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds varxZr izLrqr ltk LFkxu@tekur vkosnu ij nksuksa

¶16

S.B.Cri. Bail (SOS) Application No-296/18

¶17

¶18

i{kksa dks lquk x;kA v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkyksP; fu.kZ; ,oa miyC/k dkuwuh o rF;kRed fLFkfr ij fopkj fd;k x;kA

¶19

;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ dk dFku jgk fd lacaf/kr cSad ls vihykFkhZ ds }kjk tks 18 yk[k :i;s dk _.k fy;k x;k Fkk mlds dze esa 20 yk[k :i;s dh ,QMhvkj cSad esa izLrqr dj nh x;h gS rFkk lacaf/kr _.k dh jkf'k cSad dks ykSVk nh x;h gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku jgk fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ltk LFkfxr dh x;h gSA vr% ltk LFkxu vkosnu dks Lohdkj fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA

¶20

;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us ltk LFkxu vkosnu dk

¶21

fojks/k fd;kA

¶22

leLr rF;ksa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA izdj.k esa miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr] vihykFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk jkf'k izkfIr] ,QMhvkj ,oa jkf'k ds Hkqxrku ckcr U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr fd;s x;s rdksZa] vihy ds fopkjkFkZ xzg.k gksus] ekeys ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa ,oa vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶23

ifj.kker% ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ 'kadj yky tksxh bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 12-4-18 dks ,oa rRi'pkr tc Hkh mls vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] viuh mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj :i;s dk ca/ki= ,oa iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekursa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns

¶24

S.B.Cri. Bail (SOS) Application No-296/18

¶25

¶26

rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk, ,oa fo}ku fof'k"B U;k;k/kh'k ¼lhchvkbZ izdj.k½ dze&2] t;iqj }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k&03@2017 ¼17@2004½ esa ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukafdr 15-2-2018 ds rgr fn;s x;s n.Mkns'k dk fdz;kUo;u bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; gksus rd LFkfxr j[kk tkosA

¶27

¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr

¶28

,e 'kekZ&52

¶29

mijksDr fu.kZ;@vkns'k Hkkjr ljdkj dk jkti= la-1] fn- 02 tuojh] 1999 esa izdkf'kr x`g ea=ky;] jktHkk"kk foHkkx ds ladYi@uksfVfQds'ku ds rgr lEcfU/kr Hkk"kk ¼fgUnh½ esa [kqys U;k;ky; esa fy[kk;k x;kA

Shankarlal Jogi v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shankarlal Jogi v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikram @ Mukesh Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Om Prakash Bansal Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Hansraj Sanvariya Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

M/S S K Pharma Vs M/S Rahul Medical andSURGICAL Agency

Smt Meenakshi Surana and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan through CBI

Amar Chand Gupta Vs State of Rajasthan through P P