Allowed

Vikram @ Mukesh v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC6 Mar 2018SOSA/262/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Supreme Court granted bail to the appellant, a convict in a Southwestern States execution proceeding, during the pendency of his reconsideration application, considering the prima facie relevance of age and release dates.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to the appellant pending disposal of the reconsideration application, with authority to provide travel documents.

Vikram @ Mukesh Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

S.B.Cri. Bail (SOS) Application No-262/18

¶2

¶3

jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqjA

¶4

S.B.Cri. Bail (SOS) Application No-262/18 In S.B.Criminal Appeal No-188/18

¶5

Vikram @ Mukesh S/o Jagmal Singh B/c Gurjar, R/o Pavta Ki Dhani Jasrapur, Police Station Khetrinagar, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Distt. Jail Jhunjhunu)

¶6

----Appellant

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh

¶11

izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ ds vf/koDrk Jh nq";ar flag u:dkA yksd vfHk;kstd Jh ,u ,l 'ks[kkorA

¶12

%% vkns'k fnukd %% 06-3-2018a

¶13

U;k;ky; }kjk %&

¶14

izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 389 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds varxZr izLrqr ltk LFkxu@tekur vkosnu ij nksuksa i{kksa dks lquk x;kA v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkyksP; fu.kZ; ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k dkuwuh o rF;kRed fLFkfr ij fopkj fd;k x;kA

¶15

S.B.Cri. Bail (SOS) Application No-262/18

¶16

¶17

;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ dk dFku jgk fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ls ;g rF; Li"V gS fd vihykFkhZ ,oa vfHk;ksD=h ds iwoZ esa vkil esa laca/k Fks rFkk izdj.k esa nksuksa i{kksa esa vkilh lgefr izekf.kr gqbZ gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku jgk gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us vfHk;ksD=h dh vk;q 17 o 18 o"kZ ds e/; fpfdRldh; lk{; ds vk/kkj ij ekuh gS rFkk ;fn nks o"kZ ds vUrjky dks Hkh fxuk tkos rks vfHk;ksD=h ?kVuk ds le; o;Ld FkhA izdj.k esa ?kVuk o"kZ 2008 dh gS rFkk n.M izfdz;k lafgrk esa la'kks/ku fnukad 03-2-2013 dks gqvk gSA vr% ltk LFkxu vkosnu dks Lohdkj fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA

¶18

;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us ltk LFkxu vkosnu dk

¶19

fojks/k fd;kA

¶20

leLr rF;ksa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA izdj.k esa miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr ,oa fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk fcUnq la[;k&2 ds dze esa fn;s x;s fu"d"kZ rFkk izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk fcUnq la[;k&1 ds dze esa U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr fd;s x;s rdksZa ,oa vihy ds fopkjkFkZ xzg.k gksus] ekeys ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa ,oa vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶21

ifj.kker% ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ fodze mQZ eqds'k bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 06-4-2018 dks ,oa rRi'pkr tc Hkh mls vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] viuh mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj :i;s dk ca/ki= ,oa iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekursa

¶22

S.B.Cri. Bail (SOS) Application No-262/18

¶23

¶24

fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk, ,oa fo}ku vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] fpMkok] ftyk >qa>qauw }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k&152@2016 ¼159@2008½ esa ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukafdr 19-1-2018 ds rgr fn;s x;s n.Mkns'k dk fdz;kUo;u bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; gksus rd LFkfxr j[kk tkosA

¶25

¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr

¶26

,e 'kekZ&45

¶27

mijksDr fu.kZ;@vkns'k Hkkjr ljdkj dk jkti= la-1] fn- 02 tuojh] 1999 esa izdkf'kr x`g ea=ky;] jktHkk"kk foHkkx ds ladYi@uksfVfQds'ku ds rgr lEcfU/kr Hkk"kk ¼fgUnh½ esa [kqys U;k;ky; esa fy[kk;k x;kA

Vikram @ Mukesh v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikram @ Mukesh v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Om Prakash Bansal Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Hansraj Sanvariya Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Saud Ahmad Vs State of Raj and Anr.

M/S S K Pharma Vs M/S Rahul Medical andSURGICAL Agency

Shankarlal Jogi Vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Smt Meenakshi Surana and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan through CBI