The Single Bench of the Rajasthan High Court allowed bail application SOS Applt. 277/2018 filed by Prahlad Saini, holding that the Special Leave Petition preserving proceedings no longer applies as fresh proceedings were not filed.
Bail allowed; liberty to accede to the Division Bench if necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-277/2018 Prahlad Saini Vs. State of Raj.
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqjA
%% vkns'k %%
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-277/2018 IN S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 446/2018
Prahlad Saini S/o Panchu Ram, B/c Mali, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Near Maharaja Academy School, Shiv Colony, Police Station Sanganer, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)
--Accused/Appellant
VERSUS
State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
%% mifLFkr %%
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh
vihykFkhZ ds vf/koDrk Jh yksdsUnzflag 'ks[kkorA yksd vfHk;kstd Jh ,u-,l- 'ks[kkorA
U;k;ky; }kjk %&
izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 389 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds varxZr izLrqr ltk LFkxu@tekur vkosnu ij nksuksa i{kksa dks lquk x;kA v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkyksP; fu.kZ; ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k dkuwuh o rF;kRed fLFkfr ij fopkj fd;k x;kA
2
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-277/2018 Prahlad Saini Vs. State of Raj.
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ dk dFku jgk fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dh i=koyh ij erdk }kjk fy[kk x;k i= izn'kZ ih&36 miyC/k gS] ftlesa vihykFkhZ ij fdlh izdkj dk vkjksi ugha gS rFkk vU; ekSf[kd lk{; ls Hkh vihykFkhZ }kjk ,slk dksbZ mdlkok@nq"izsj.k ( **abetment** ) fd;k tkuk izdV ugha gksrk gS] ftlls erdk vkRegR;k djus ds fy;s etcwj gqbZ gksA mudk rdZ jgk fd vihykFkhZ ds nks NksVs cPps gSa vkSj muds ikyu iks"k.k dh ftEesnkjh vihykFkhZ ij gh gSA vr% ltk LFkxu vkosnu dks Lohdkj fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA
;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us ltk LFkxu vkosnu dk
fojks/k fd;kA
;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd dks iwoZ is'kh ij ltk LFkxu vkosnu dk U;k; n`"VkUr ,vkbZvkj 2014 ,llh 3062 vrqy f=ikBh cuke mRrjizns'k jkT; dh jks'kuh esa fyf[kr esa tokc izLrqr djus gsrq volj iznku fd;k x;k Fkk] ysfdu tokc izLrqr ugha gqvk gSA
leLr rF;ksa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA izdj.k esa miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr] cgl ds nkSjku ;ksX; vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr rdksZa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ izgykn
3
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-277/2018 Prahlad Saini Vs. State of Raj.
lSuh bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 08-06-2018 dks ,oa rRi'pkr tc Hkh mls vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] viuh mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj :i;s dk ca/ki= ,oa iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekursa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk, ,oa fo}ku vfrfjDr ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] efgyk mRihM+u izdj.k] dze&1] t;iqj egkuxj] t;iqj }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k &01@2012 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukafdr 21-02-2018 ds rgr fn;s x;s n.Mkns'k dk fdz;kUo;u bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; rd LFkfxr j[kk tkrk gSA
¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr
Fkkokuh@& mijksDr fu.kZ;@vkns'k Hkkjr ljdkj dk jkti= la[;k&1] fnukad 02 tuojh] 1999 esa izdkf'kr x`g ea=ky;] jktHkk"kk foHkkx ds ladYi@uksfVfQds'ku ds rgr lacaf/kr Hkk"kk ¼fgUnh½ esa [kqys U;k;ky; eas fy[kk;k x;kA
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail application filed by the appellant is eligible for disposal under Section 439 CrPC given the preservation of pending proceedings by Special Leave Petition No. 9342 of 2018
Whether the Special Leave Petition No. 9342 of 2018 dated 21-02-2018 preserving proceedings remains in effect for this bail application
Prahlad Saini
State of Rajasthan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
