In an SOS Bail application dated 2018, the High Court of Rajasthan, with a bench of four judges, granted bail to Saud Ahmad. The court noted the petitioner had been in custody for over a year and found him released from illegal custody.
Bail granted; directive to issue non-bailable warrant if absconded on specified date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-99/2018 Saud Ahmad Vs. State of Raj. & Anr.
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqjA
%% vkns'k %%
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-99/2018 IN S.B. Criminal Revision No. 326/2018
Saud Ahmad
Vs.
State of Raj. & Anr..
%% mifLFkr %%
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh
;kph ds vf/koDrk Jh lhrkjke pkS/kjhA yksd vfHk;kstd Jh oh-,l- xksnkjkA v;kph la[;k &2 ds vf/koDrk Jh lqjs'k dqekjA
%% vkns'k %% 05-03-2018
U;k;ky; }kjk %&
izkFkhZ&;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr ltk LFkxu@tekur vkosnu ij nksuksa i{kksa dks lquk x;kA v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ,oa v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; ds vkyksP; fu.kZ; ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k dkuwuh o rF;kRed fLFkfr ij fopkj fd;k x;kA
2
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-99/2018 Saud Ahmad Vs. State of Raj. & Anr.
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&;kph dk dFku jgk fd izkFkhZ&;kph dks vf/kdre ,d o"kZ dh ltk ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS ,oa izkFkhZ&;kph orZeku esa vfHkj{kk esa gSA i{kksa esa jkthukek gks pqdk gSA vr% ltk LFkxu vkosnu dks Lohdkj fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA
;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us ltk LFkxu vkosnu dk
fojks/k fd;kA
;ksX; vf/koDrk v;kph la[;k& 2 us izdV fd;k fd i{kksa esa jkthukek gks pqdk gS ,oa ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;s tkus esa mUgsa dksbZ ,srjkt ugha gSA
leLr rF;ksa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk izkFkhZ&;kph dks /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fyf[kr vf/kfu;e e sa nks"kh djkj nsrs gq, vf/kdre ,d o"kZ dh ltk ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS] ftlds fo:) izLrqr vihy v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk [kkfjt dh xbZ gSA vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa ,oa iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ&;kph lvn vgen bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 05-04-2018 dks ,oa rRi'pkr tc Hkh mls vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] viuh mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj :i;s dk ca/ki= ,oa iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekursa
3
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-99/2018 Saud Ahmad Vs. State of Raj. & Anr.
fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk, ,oa fo}ku egkuxj eftLVªsV] la[;k& 18 ] t;iqj egkuxj }kjk QkStnkjh izdj.k la[;k& 67@2012 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukafdr 20-012016 ,oa v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky;] fof'k"B U;k;k/kh'k] Lokid vkS"kf/k ,oa eu% izHkkoh inkFkZ izdj.k] t;iqj }kjk nkf.Md vihy la[;k& 17@2017 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; 16-12-2017 ds rgr v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; dh iqf"V dj n.Mkns'k dks ;Fkkor j[kus ds vkns'k dk fdz;kUo;u bl iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk ds vfUre fu.kZ; rd LFkfxr j[kk tkrk gSA
¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr
Fkkokuh@&
mijksDr fu.kZ;@vkns'k Hkkjr ljdkj dk jkti= la[;k&1] fnukad 02 tuojh] 1999 esa izdkf'kr x`g ea=ky;] jktHkk"kk foHkkx ds ladYi@uksfVfQds'ku ds rgr lacaf/kr Hkk"kk ¼fgUnh½ esa [kqys U;k;ky; eas fy[kk;k x;kA
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to the petitioner in S.B. Cri. Bail Application-99/2018.
Whether the petitioner is in lawful or illegal custody.
Saud Ahmad
State of Raj.
Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh
Jh lhrkjke pkS/kjh
Jh oh-,l- xksnkjkA
Jh lqjs'k dqekj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
