The High Court allowed the appellant's application for leave to withdraw the appeal. The tax effect was below Rs. 50 Lakhs per the relevant Revenue Circular. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the appeal allowed; appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Central/Excise Appeal No. 83/2009
Union of India through the Commissioner, Central Excise, Jaipur II, New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle “C” Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.).
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vipul Singhvi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjeev Johari
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
06/09/2018
The matter comes up on an application preferred on behalf of the appellant seeking leave to withdraw the appeal.
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that in view of the Circular No. F.No.390/Misc./116/2017-JC dated 11.7.18 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs, the tax effect involved in the present appeal being less than 50,00,000/- (Fifty Lacs), the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
The application is allowed.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
(SANGEET LODHA),J
vij21
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to withdraw the appeal should be granted in view of the tax effect being less than Rs. 50 Lakhs under the Revenue Circular.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Union of India
M/s Banswara Syntex Ltd.
The Custom, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal
Sangeet Lodha
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
