Writ petition filed seeking quashing of an order impleading petitioner as defendant in a civil suit. Court held that since the underlying suit was dismissed, the challenge no longer survives and dismissed the petition.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9873 / 2015
Daya Ram Maharshi S/o Sh ri Hardayal Ram by caste Brahmin, aged around 51 years, R/o H ouse No.1, Panchwati II, Sri Ganganagar. At present resident Gaur Brahmin Sabha, situated near Tara Chand Vatika, Sri Ganganagar.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankaj Sharma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Surendra Thanvi for Sanjeet Purohit
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
06/03/2018
“It is, therefore, most respectfully and humbly prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and by issuing appropriate writ, order or direction, the order dated 31.08.2015 passed by learned Addl. Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate No.2, Sri Ganganagar in civil suit NO.32/2015 to the extent of impleading petitioner as defendant in stead of petitioner may kindly be set aside and quashed and the application dated
(2 of 2)
[CW-9873/2015]
30.07.2015 of the petitioner may kindly be allowed in toto.
Any other appropriate order, which deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favout of the petitioner-defendant.”
sudheer
Daya Ram Maharshi
Vinod Kaushik
Heera Lal Gaur
Pawan Gaur
Gaur Brahmin Sabha
Dr. Justice Puspendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
