Abhishek Mehta and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's counsel stated the writ petition was infructuous; the High Court dismissed the petition on that ground.
Petitioner's counsel stated the writ petition was infructuous; the High Court dismissed the petition on that ground.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6942 / 2017
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Rajat Dave
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
05/03/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that this writ
petition has become infructuous.
Consequently, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI)J.
sudheer
Abhishek Mehta
Kapil Paneri
The State of Rajasthan Through the Secretary, Medical and Health Department
The State Institute of Health and Family Welfare
The Project Director, National Health Mission
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court