Coordinate Bench referred to prior adjudication. Court directed petitioners to submit comprehensive representation. Respondents directed to decide within four weeks. Writ application disposed with no substantive order.
Direct petitioners to submit comprehensive representation. Direct respondents to consider and decide within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writs No. 7331/2018
----Petitioners
Versus
(2 of 3)
[CW-7331/2018]
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Order
06/04/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outset, submits that the controversy raised in the instant writ application is no more res-integra in view of the adjudication made by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ petition Number 14215/2012: Vikram Chand & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors., decided on 3rd October, 2012.
It is further contended that for the present; the petitioners would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners, within a
(3 of 3) [CW-7331/2018]
time frame, which they are ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter.
In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioners to address a comprehensive representation enclosing a copy of the order in the case of Vikram Chand & Ors. (supra).
In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.
With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed off.
(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.
SS/199
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to dispose the writ petition considering prior adjudication on same issue.
Whether to direct respondents to consider pending representations within specified time.
Whether to dispose the instant writ application with limited prayer.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vikram Chand & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Referred¶35
S.B. Civil Writ petition Number 14215/2012: Vikram Chand & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Prem Kumar Others
State Of Rajasthan
Veerendr Singh Siradhana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
