Disposed

Lekhapal Singh v. Union of India and Ors.

Rajasthan HC3 Apr 2018CW/6693/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner in civil writ petition sought direction to respondents to consider his representation within a specific timeframe. Court closed proceedings and directed respondents to decide a comprehensive representation within eight weeks via a reasoned order.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was allowed to address a representation within two weeks; the State-respondents directed to decide it within eight weeks via a reasoned order.

Lekhapal Singh Vs Union of India and Ors. — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writs No. 6693/2018

¶3

Lekhapal Singh Doi S/o Govind Singh Gurjar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Goliya, Post Brahaman Bairada, Tehsil Sikrai, Distt. Dausa. (Raj.).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

Union Of India Through Secretary, Home Department, Government Of India, Secretariat, New Delhi.

¶7

Staff Selection Commission Through Its Chairman (Nr) North Region, Block No.12, C.g.o. Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi.

¶8

The Officer Incharge (Recruitment), Border Security Force, Head Quarter, Gujarat Border, Post Bsf Premises Chilora Road, Gandhi Nagar, Gujarat.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya
For Respondent(s)	:

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA

¶12

Order

¶13

03/04/2018

¶14

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied, if the Staterespondents are directed to consider and decide the representation within a time frame, which the petitioner is ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter.

¶15

In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation to the respondents ventilating grievances raised herein.

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CW-6693/2018]

¶18

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.

¶19

With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed off.

¶20

(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA),J

¶21

SS/135

Lekhapal Singh v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lekhapal Singh v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laxmi Devi Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Omveer Singh Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Ramesh Chand Meena Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Lalit Kumar Arora Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Kanwar Singh Yadav Vs R S R T C and Ors.

Prem Kumar and Ors. Vs State of Raj and Ors.