Disposed

Omveer Singh v. State of Raj and Ors.

Rajasthan HC22 Mar 2018CW/6295/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ application, the petitioner sought direction for consideration of his employment representation, relying on a prior coordinate bench decision. The court disposed of the matter by directing the petitioner to file a comprehensive representation within two weeks, ensuring state respondents decide within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file comprehensive representation within two weeks; state respondents to decide within four weeks.

Omveer Singh Vs State of Raj and Ors. — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writs No. 6295/2018

¶3

Omveer Singh S/o Shri Amar Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Karkala Post Paprera Tehsil Kumher District Bharatpur (Rajasthan.) At Present R/o Katra, Near Katra School Idea Tower, Nadbai District Bharatpur At Present Working On The Post Of Teacher Grade Iii At Government Upper Primary School, Sarangpur, Tehsil Panchayat Samiti Nagar, District, Bharatpur.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan Through Secretary Rural Development Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

¶7

Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.

¶8

Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bharatpur.

¶9

District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Bharatpur.

¶10

Block Elementary Education Officer, Sewar, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan.)

¶11

Block Elementary Education Officer, Nadbai

¶12

Block Elementary Education Officer, Kumher, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan).

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. T.C. Vyas For Respondent(s) :

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA

¶16

Order

¶17

22/03/2018

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the controversy raised in the instant writ application is no more res-integra in view of the adjudication made by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ petition Number

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[CW-6295/2018]

¶21

14215/2012: Vikram Chand & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors., decided on 3^rd October, 2012.

¶22

It is further contended that for the present; the petitioner would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, within a time frame, which he is ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter.

¶23

In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation enclosing a copy of the order in the case of Vikram Chand & Ors. (supra).

¶24

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.

¶25

With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed off.

¶26

(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.

¶27

SS/221

Omveer Singh v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Omveer Singh v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Chand Meena Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Tarun Kumar Gautam Vs Principal Secretary and Ors.

Sandeep Varma Vs R S R T C and Anr.

Laxmi Devi Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Lekhapal Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

Lalit Kumar Arora Vs State of Raj and Ors.