Allowed

Anita Kumari v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Rajasthan HC14 Aug 2018CW/4642/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a short order, the High Court allowed this writ petition relying on a previous decision in Dhanraj Meena, directing respondents to apply relevant Rules for the petitioner's pay fixation and relief. No substantive legal principle was elaborated beyond the reference.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is allowed; authorities directed to follow relevant Rules regarding pay fixation and issue appropriate relief orders with last pay certificate.

Anita Kumari Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT of JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ No. 4642/2018

¶3

Anita Kumari D/o Rakesh Kumar W/o Ramraj Meena, R/o Village Post Bhiyan, Teh. K. Patan, Dist. Bundi Rajasthan.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan through the Secretary, Rural And Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶7

Director, Sanskrit Education, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶8

Zila Parishad, Bundi through The Chief Executive officer.

¶9

Zila Parishad, Jalore through The Chief Executive officer.

¶10

The Block Elementary Education officer, Bheenmal, District Jalore.

¶11

The Block Elementary Education officer, Bundi, District Bundi.

¶12

Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti-Bundi, District Bundi. 8. Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti- Bheenmal, District Jalore.

¶13

District Education officer Elementary Education, Bundi.

¶14

District Education officer Elementary Education Jalore.

¶15

----Respondents

¶16

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.R. Saharan. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikas Choudhary for Mr. S.S. Ladrecha

¶17

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA

¶18

Order

¶19

14/08/2018

¶20

It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by order of this Court in Dhanraj Meena v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12846/2017, decided on 15.1.2018 and,

¶21

(2 of 2)

¶22

[CW-4642/2018]

¶23

therefore, the present writ petition may also be decided in light of the said order.

¶24

In view of the submissions made, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is allowed in light of order passed by this Court in Dhanraj Meena (supra) with similar directions, which reads as

¶25

under:-

¶26

“In view thereof, the writ petitions filed by the petitioners are allowed, as the petitioners have already been relieved pursuant to the interim orders passed by this Court, the said interim orders passed by this Court directing to relieve the petitioners are made absolute.

¶27

It is further directed that the respondents while dealing with the cases of the petitioners pertaining to their pay fixation etc. would follow the provisions of Rules 24 and 26 of the RSR as per law.

¶28

In cases where the petitioners have been relieved provisionally under the directions of this Court, the Authorities would pass appropriate orders pertaining to relieving of the petitioners alongwith their last pay certificate (L.P.C.), where they were serving earlier.”

¶29

(P.K. LOHRA),J

¶30

a.asopa/-47

Anita Kumari v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anita Kumari v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jawana Ram Vs Rajendra Kumar and Ors.

Jhakh Gram Sewa Sah. Samiti Ltd. and Anr. Vs State of Raj. and Ors.

Smt. Ujala Prajapat Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Ram Lal and Anr. Vs State Panchayat Raj and Ors.

Kirta Ram Vs Union of India and Ors.

Anil Kumar Vs Chanchal Kumar and Ors.