The High Court at Jodhpur dismissed connected writ petitions challenging interim proceedings on the ground that the main suit had already been decided, rendering the petitions infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 3500/2018
Anil Kumar S/o Mohanlal Tanter , R/o Sanwad, Tehsil Malwi, District Udaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ No. 7064/2017
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
(2 of 2)
[CW-3500/2018]
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Saruparia For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
14/08/2018
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the suit itself has been decided, whereas they have come against interim proceedings.
In light of such statement, the writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Dr. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
Sanjay
Anil Kumar S/o Mohanlal Tanter
Chanchal Kumar S/o Dhramchand Surana
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
