Bhoori Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Veerendr Singh Siradhana disposed of the writ petition in same terms as in previous bench decisions led by Kashi Ram and Manoj Kumar Natwaria.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Veerendr Singh Siradhana disposed of the writ petition in same terms as in previous bench decisions led by Kashi Ram and Manoj Kumar Natwaria.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3760 / 2018
Bhoori Singh S/o Heera Singh, Aged About 32 Years, Resident of Dhori Ka Pura, Dholpur, Tehsil. Dholpur, District Dholpur (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Meel
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Order
19/02/2018
The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the order dated 17.5.2017 passed by this Court while deciding bunch of writ petitions, lead case being Kashi Ram vs. Union of India & Anr. SBCWP No.2867/2017, along with Manoj Kumar Natwaria vs. UOI & Ors. , SBCWP No.3317/2016 and Narendra Singh vs. SSC , SBCWP No.3858/2012.
As prayed, the present writ petition is disposed off, in same terms, as in the case of Manoj Kumar Natwaria vs. UOI & Ors. , SBCWP No.3317/2016 and Narendra Singh vs. SSC ,
(2 of 2)
[CW-3760/2018]
SBCWP No.3858/2012, decided on 9.5.2017, along with bunch of writ petitions, lead case being Kashi Ram vs. Union of India & Anr . SBCWP No.2867/2017.
(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.
SS/187
Bhoori Singh S/o Heera Singh
The Union of India Through Under Secretary, Staff Selection Commission, Nothern Region, New Delhi
Veerendr Singh Siradhana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court