Petitioner invoked coordinate bench decision to seek direction for reconsideration. Court closed proceedings and directed petitioner to submit comprehensive representation representing order in related case..
Writ proceedings closed; petitioner directed to submit comprehensive representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3402 / 2018
Narayan Ram S/o Sh. Mukana Ram, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Mohalla Dhankoli Tehsil & District Nagaur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shiv S Choudhary For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Order
19/02/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the controversy raised in the instant writ application is no more res-integra in view of the adjudication made by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition Number 12450/2016: Harishankar Verma v. State of Rajasthan & Ors., decided on 3rd October, 2016; after according opportunity of hearing to the learned counsel for the State-respondents.
It is further contended that for the present; the petitioner would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, within a
(2 of 2)
[CW-3402/2018]
time frame, which he is ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter.
In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation enclosing a copy of the order in the case of Harishankar Verma (supra).
In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.
With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed off.
(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.
SS/60
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ proceedings should be disposed of given a coordinate bench has already adjudicated the controversy.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Harishankar Verma v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Referred¶16
S.B. Civil Writ Petition Number 12450/2016: Harishankar Verma v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Narayan Ram
State of Rajasthan
VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
