This order allows a writ petition seeking quashing of a Physical Efficiency Test result. The court relied on a connected case and directed holding a fresh PET, with future appointment benefits if successful.
PET result quashed; fresh PET to be held on 15.12.2018; appointment and benefits to be granted if petitioner passes.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 18408/2018
Manphool S/o Hajari Ram, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Hanuman Nagar Newa Kanasar, Tehsil Bap, District Jodhpur (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Inderjeet Yadav. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Deepika Purohit for Mr. P.R. Singh, AAG.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
Order
04/12/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered in the case of Revant Ram Meghwal & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : SBCWP No.13731/2018 & other connected writ petitions decided on 27.11.2018, wherein qua the PET held on 10.09.2018 at Kota, determination has been made that the track was slightly muddy and therefore, the result of PET was quashed and the petitioners were granted one more opportunity to undergo PET.
(2 of 2)
[CW-18408/2018]
Learned counsel for the respondents is not in a position to dispute that the issue raised is covered by the case of Revant Ram Meghwal & Ors. (supra).
In view of the submissions made, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is allowed. The result of the petitioner in this petition pertaining to the PET conducted by the respondents is quashed and set-aside. The respondents are directed to hold fresh PET for the petitioner on 15.12.2018 at Rajasthan Police Training Centre, Mandore Road, Jodhpur and based on the performance of the petitioner, if the petitioner passes the PET and his name appears in the merit-list, he shall be granted appointment from the date other candidates were granted appointment pursuant to the recruitment with actual benefits from the date of appointment.
(ARUN BHANSALI),J
210-Sumit/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the result of the Physical Efficiency Test (PET) conducted for the petitioner should be quashed and a fresh PET held.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Revant Ram Meghwal & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Referred¶15
Revant Ram Meghwal & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : SBCWP No.13731/2018
Manphool
State Of Rajasthan
Arun Bhansali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
