A writ petition filed by Savita Ameta against educational and pension department officials was voluntarily withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to approach appropriate authorities later; the High Court accordingly dismissed the petition.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed with liberty to take appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 18296/2018
Savita Ameta W/o Shri Narendra Kumar, Aged About 63 Years, 489, Ambamata Scheme Girwa, Udaipur Shastri Circle Girwa, Udaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sushil Solanki. For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
Order
04/12/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to take appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.
In view of the submissions made, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
(ARUN BHANSALI),J
59-PKS/-
Savita Ameta W/o Shri Narendra Kumar
State Of Rajasthan
Dy. Director, Elementary Education, Udaipur
District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Udaipur
Dy. Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Department, Udaipur
Arun Bhansali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
