Jeeta Ram v. Daya Ram
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought permission to withdraw writ petition with liberty to summon documents/witness. Court granted withdrawal but clarified that liberty to move an application under CPC is not an order granting leave.
What did the court decide?
Permission granted to withdraw writ petition with liberty to move an application for summoning documents/witness.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 17439/2018
Jeeta Ram S/o Shri Magaji, Aged About 55 Years, By Caste Maru Kumhar, Resident Of Khimada, Tehsil Sumerpur, District- Pali (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
Daya Ram S/o Shri Kupaji, Aged About 55 Years, By Caste Maru Kumahr, Resident Of Khimada, Tehsil Sumerpur, District- Pali (Rajasthan).
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Suthar For Respondent(s) : - - - - - -
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order
16/11/2018
After arguing for some time, Mr. Govind Suthar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition, with liberty to move appropriate application for summoning the documents/witness under relevant provision of Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jeeta Ram
- respondent
Daya Ram
Coram
DINESH MEHTA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/17439/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court