The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of a writ petition concerning Safai Karamchari recruitment by directing the petitioner to approach a constituted redressal committee, following the precedent set in Ravi Jajot.
Petitioner directed to approach the constituted redressal committee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 16746/2018
Rekha Harijan W/o Late Shri Ravi Harijan, Aged About 30 Years, By Caste Harijan, Opposite Anjuman Nohare, Kahci Basti Ghandhi Nagar, Ward No. 25, Chittorgarh
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B.P. Rajpurohit. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Parvez for Mr. Rajesh Panwar, AAG.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Order
05/12/2018
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner raising issues pertaining to the recruitment for the post of Safai Karamchari by the Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the issues raised in the present writ petition are squarely covered by the judgment in Ravi Jajot & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : SBCWP No.10496/2018, decided on 30.08.2018, wherein even for the issues, which are not covered by the judgment, it was directed that the petitioners therein would represent before the respondents and a further direction has been given for consideration by a proper redressal committee.
It is further submitted that pursuant to the said direction, a redressal committee has been constituted by order dated
(2 of 2)
[CW-16746/2018]
27.09.2018 by the respondents and therefore, in light of the said judgment and constitution of the committee, the petitioner may also approach the said committee with the grievances as raised in the present writ petition.
In the case of Ravi Jajot (supra), it was directed as under :-
“92. Before parting with this judgment, this Court makes it clear that any issue other than the issues dealt with by this Court in this judgment, which remains open, shall be represented by the petitioners to the respondents, and the respondents shall decide all those factual and legal issues by passing a respective speaking order in the cases of the petitioners, after giving them proper opportunity of hearing, strictly in accordance with law, as it is not possible for this Court to go into individual facts of individual petitioner in such exercise, and therefore, this Court directs the respondents to pass lawful and speaking orders in all those matters.
In view of the above directions and the fact that a committee has been constituted, the writ petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of with similar directions as given in the case of Ravi Jajot (supra).
(ARUN BHANSALI),J
21-Sumit/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the writ petition regarding recruitment for Safai Karamchari post following directions in a related judgment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ravi Jajot & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Followed¶13
Ravi Jajot & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : SBCWP No.10496/2018
Rekha Harijan
State Of Rajasthan
Municipal Council Chittorgarh
Arun Bhansali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
