Anchi v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner appealed against appointment granted to respondent No.6. Appeals remain pending before authorities. Court held writ intervention premature. Ordered respondent No.2/No.4 to dispose of pending appeals within four weeks after hearing petitioner.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of. Authorities directed to decide pending appeals within four weeks after hearing petitioner.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 14180/2018
Anchi W/o Rupa Ram, Aged About 28 Years, 474, Ambedkar Colony Karamavas, Tehsil Siwana, District Barmer (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
- State Of Rajasthan, Through The Director And Special Administration Secretary, Woman And Child Development Department, Jaipur (Raj.).
- Dy. Director, Samekit Bal Vikas Yojna, Women And Child Development Department, Jaipur (Raj.).
- The Child Development Project Officer, Siwana, District Barmer (Raj.).
- Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Barmer, District Barmer (Raj.).
- Gram Sewak Paden Sachiv/ Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Karmawas, Tehsil- Samdari, District- Barmer (Raj.).
- Rekha W/o Kewal Ram,, Ramdev, Karmawas, Tehsil Samdari, District Barmer.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ court can interfere while appeals filed by the petitioner are pending consideration before the administrative authorities.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anchi W/o Rupa Ram
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan
- respondent
Rekha W/o Kewal Ram
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/14180/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court