A petition claiming non-integral status due to prior adjudication was disposed of by directing the respondents to consider a comprehensive representation within two weeks.
Directed respondents to consider a comprehensive representation within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writs No. 13659/2018
Lalit Kumar Ninama S/o Shri Karam Chand Ninama , Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village- Garanvas Post Som Tehsil Jhadol District Udaipur (Rajasthan) At Present Working On The Post Of Teacher Grade-Iii At Government Shikshakarmi Primary School, Padli Grampanchayat Kukavas, Tehsil And Panchayat Samiti Kotda, District, Udaipur (Rajasthan)
HBN'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Order
04/07/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the controversy raised in the instant writ application is no more res-integra in view of the adjudication made by a
Coordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ petition Number 14215/2012: Vikram Chand & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors., decided on 3rd October, 2012.
It is further contended that for the present; the petitioner would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, within a time frame, which the petitioner is ready and willing to address .: L. 9 "rr; cp within two weeks here.ina&ei!q +A ;xi e,k p-,'n,2. $$ f (9 : $22,ivt, $>, :s- $, -< . . <@&' f2, $ Yk .. ,a, ,e In view,.of--the limited prayer addresses,;_ %he instant writ ,A %B2' g fk2(2 r 3: _%3_* & L*" "F,+* proceedings<are .,) &? closed with a direction to the petitioh-efqo -/address ,pc;jL.,"2 $$'$+f; 8 "4. P+$a comprehensive representation enclosing a copy of th!e@brder in $ ,Tg:-?-ry, the case of Vikram Chand & Q:;,G~AS.M;E
In case, a dressed within the aforesaid period, th irected to consider and decide the sa nd speaking order as expeditiously as po th law. However, in no case later than four the ..:; g{:;<gPg qBj+# ^ representation along w:th"~~a:ceb~ jiyyp3 &+~g::.,f.. ,this order. w&i.$ $ $"+& With the observ&f)$-&ax *,,,-- :,: "p- -\v-p-.@--ve, the a&w&?z$a writ application stands disposed off.
(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)].
Lalit Kumar Ninama
Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan
Veerendr Singh Siradhana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
