Rajbala v. Civil Judge, Bhadra
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the writ petition and associated stay application, reserving rights to contest before the trial court.
Petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the writ petition and associated stay application, reserving rights to contest before the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 13338/2018
Rajbala W/o Late Shri Sampat Kumar, Aged About 40 Years, By Caste Jat, Malsisar, Presently Residing At Ward No. 25, Bhoori Khera, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. V.D. Gaur For Respondent(s) : --
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Judgment / Order
22/10/2018
Learned Counsel Shri Gaur, after arguing the matter for some length craves to withdraw the instant writ petition reserving the petitioner’s right to raise all permissible objections before the trial court at appropriate stage. Thus, the writ petition as well as the stay application are dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for.
(SANDEEP MEHTA),J
Sudhir Asopa/68
Rajbala
Civil Judge, Bhadra
Bhanu Kumar
Rajesh
Priyanka
SANDEEP MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court