Disposed

Saindi Motor Driving School v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Oct 2018CW/16132/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This common order disposed of multiple writ petitions filed by licensed motor driving schools seeking an extension of time to comply with the new Motor Driving School Registration, 2018 Guidelines granted by the State of Rajasthan.

What did the court decide?

Extension of time granted for compliance and inspection by 31.12.2018; grievance mechanism established; stay applications disposed of.

Saindi Motor Driving School Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ No. 16097/2018

¶3

Friends Motor Driving Training School

----Petitioner

Versus

State of Rajasthan

-----Respondent

Connected matters S.B. Civil Writ No. 16123/2018

¶9

Waves Motor Driving School

¶10

State of Rajasthan

¶11

----Petitioner Versus -----Respondent

¶12

S.B. Civil Writ No. 16124/2018

¶13

Deora Motor Driving School
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan
-----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ No. 16127/2018
Radhika Motor Driving School
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan
-----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ No. 16132/2018
Saindi Motor Driving School
----Petitioner

(2 of 4)

[CW-16097/2018]

Versus

State of Rajasthan

-----Respondent

S.B. Civil Writ No. 16194/2018

¶20

Marwar Motor Driving School

----Petitioner

Versus

State of Rajasthan

-----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanwar Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R. Paliwal, Dy.G.C.

¶26

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA

¶27

Order

¶28

12/10/2018

¶29

Issue notice of the writ petition to the respondents.

¶30

Shri S.R. Paliwal, Dy.G.C. has put in appearance in one of the Writ Petition No.15979/2018. Thus, he is directed to appear on behalf of the respondents in all identical matters which are listed today.

¶31

With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the instant bunch of writ petitions which involve identical questions of facts and law are being decided together by this common order.

¶32

The petitioners herein are all Motor Driving Schools having licenses to operate under the Rules as they existed. The Government of Rajasthan introduced a new scheme titled as Motor Driving School Registration, 2018 (hereinafter referred as ‘MDSR Guidelines, 2018’). All the licensed motor driving schools were

¶33

(3 of 4) [CW-16097/2018]

¶34

required to comply with the modalities laid thereunder within a period of six months form the date of issuance of the policy so as to entitle them to continue their operations. The petitioners were issued notices to comply with the MDSR Guidelines, 2018 in the month of May, 2018, They have approached this Court through these writ petitions seeking extension of time so to ensure compliance of all the modalities of the policy. It is claimed that some of the modalities prescribed under the MDSR Guidelines, 2018 are pending approval at the end of the transport authorities and clarifications are awaited.

¶35

Shri Paliwal, Dy.G.C. appearing for the respondents fairly concedes that in view of the fact that new policy requires extensive modalities and procedures, reasonable extension of time may be granted to the petitioners for ensuring full compliance of the MDSR Guidelines, 2018.

¶36

In this background, it is hereby directed that the petitioners shall ensure full compliance of MDSR Guidelines, 2018 on or before 31.12.2018. They shall get their facilities inspected by the competent authority on or before 31.12.2018. If the arrangements/facilities and complaint with the guidelines, are found satisfactory then the respective petitioners will be permitted to continue their operations under the new policy.

¶37

In case, the petitioners raise any grievances regarding hurdles in implementation of any policy modalities which require intervention by the transport department, they may submit a representation to this effect to the concerned authority within 30 days from today. The issue shall be resolved at the earliest and not later than within 30 days from the date of submission of such representations.

¶38

(4 of 4)

¶39

[CW-16097/2018]

¶40

The writ petitions as well as the stay applications are disposed of in the above terms.

¶41

(SANDEEP MEHTA),J

¶42

mamta/C-1 to 6

Saindi Motor Driving School v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saindi Motor Driving School v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohan Lal Vs Union of India

Mangi Bai Vs Union of India

M/S. Hinglaj Enterprises, Vs State and Anr.

Sarwar Khan Vs Jai Narayan Vyas University

Arvind and Ors. Vs State and Ors.

Rajendra Kumar and Ors. Vs State and Ors.