The Court disposed of an interlocutory application arguing that no substantive issue could arise if no evidence presented, dismissing the argument without merit and dismissing the application.
dismissal of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqj
,dyihB flfoy vUrj.k izkFkZuk i= l[;k a &63@2018
vkns'k fnukad%& 31&05&2018 ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh izdk'k xqIrk
mifLFkr%&
dksbZ mifLFkr ugha A
bl izdj.k esa izkFkhZ;k dh eq[; :i ls ;g O;Fkk Fkh fd bl vUrj.k ;kfpdk esa dksbZ LFkxu u gksus ds ckotwn Hkh lacaf/kr ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; }kjk izdj.k esa dksbZ izHkkoh dk;Zokgh ugha dh tkdj rkjh[ksa nh tk jgh gSa A
bl laca/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; ds ihBklhu vf/kdkjh ls Li"Vhdj.k ekaxk x;k Fkk tksg izkIr gksus ds ckn mls mfpr ugha ikrs gq, lacaf/kr U;k;ky; ds ihBklhu vf/kdkjh dks vkt O;fDr'k% mifLFkr gksus gsrq funsZf'kr fd;k x;k Fkk A
Jh vt; dqekj Hkkstd] ihBklhu vf/kdkjh ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; dze&3] t;iqj egkuxj O;fDr'k% mifLFkr gSa A mUgksaus tkfgj fd;k fd mUgksaus fnukad 02-05-2018 dks gh dk;Z xzg.k fd;k gS vkSj lacaf/kr rykd ;kfpdk muds le{k loZizFke fnukad 25-05-2018 dks gh izLrqr gq;h Fkh o bl frfFk ij izkFkhZ;k dh vksj ls bl vk'k; dk izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k Fkk fd og bl LFkkukUrj.k izkFkZuk i= dks izR;kg`r dj ysxhA ihBklhu vf/kdkjh }kjk U;k;ky; dks ;g fo'okl fnyk;k x;k fd os lacaf/kr rykd ;kfpdk dks fof/kuqlkj 'kh?kzkfr'kh?kz fuLrkfjr djus dk iz;kl djsaxs A
2
mDr rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa bl izkFkZuk i= esa dksbZ vkns'k ikfjr fd;k tkuk visf{kr ugha gS] vr% ;g izkFkZuk i= blh vuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gS A
¼U;k0 izdk'k xqIrk½
_f"kds'k lksuh@25
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
