Disposed

Girraj Singh v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Rajasthan HC5 Feb 2018CRLW/48/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph order in a Writ Petition under Article 226 accepted the State advocate's assurance to submit a fair and expeditious investigation report with the Magistrate as sufficient grounds to dispose of the case without issuing a mandatory direction.

What did the court decide?

Directing the State to submit a fair investigation report expeditiously, which satisfied the court to dismiss the writ petition.

Girraj Singh Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors. — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Writ No. 48 / 2018

¶3

Girraj Singh S/o Shri Ram Swaroop B/c Jat, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Village Bharithal, Police Station Kathumar, District Alwar, Raj.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan Through Its Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶7

State of Rajasthan Through PP.

¶8

Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur, Raj.

¶9

The Superintendent of Police, Alwar, Raj.

¶10

The Station House Officer, Police Station Kathumar, District Alwar, Raj.

¶11

Investigation Officer in the FIR No.0391/2017, Police Station Laxmangarh, District Alwar, Raj.

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

_____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Shrimali, A.G.A.

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA

Order

05/02/2018

Heard.

The instant Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the complainant/petitioner praying interalia that a direction be issued to the respondents to conduct fair, proper, impartial and expeditious investigation in a case arising out of FIR No. 391/2017, registered at Police Station

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[CRLW-48/2018]

¶21

Kathumar, District Alwar for offence under Sections 143, 323, 341 and 379 of IPC.

¶22

The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State, to allay the apprehension of the complainant/petitioner, at the out set, has submitted that if the investigation report is not submitted yet than not only fair investigation shall be conducted, but the report of investigation, along with the opinion of the Investigating Officer shall be submitted before the Magistrate having jurisdiction expeditiously.

¶23

The learned counsel appearing for the complainant/petitioner submitted that the present writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the statement made by the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

¶24

Ordered accordingly.

¶25

(BANWARI LAL SHARMA)J.

¶26

S. Kumawat/35

Girraj Singh v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Girraj Singh v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State of Rajasthan Vs Phoolchand @ Phooliya

Shiv Dayal Singh Vs Shri Naresh Pal Gangwar and Ors.

Shivam Fabrics Vs Narsingh Textiles

Dev Karan Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Mukesh Vs State Home Departmentanr

Ravi Saxena Vs State of Rajasthan through P P