Smt Madhubala v. State and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
In a criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking directions for fair investigation, the High Court held that since a negative report was filed and the Judicial Magistrate ordered further investigation, the petitioner should approach the Magistrate instead.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 900/2018
Smt. Madhubala W/o Shri Anil Vyas , By Caste- Brahmin, R/oKalyanpur, District- Barmer Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
- The State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.
- The Superintendent Of Police , Barmer Raj..
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rameshwar Dave For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.S. Rajpurohit, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Order
03/07/2018
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can seek direction for fair and expeditious investigation under Section 482 Cr.P.C. when a negative final report has been filed and further investigation ordered by the Magistra
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Smt. Madhubala W/o Shri Anil Vyas
- respondent
The State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.
- respondent
The Superintendent Of Police , Barmer
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMP/900/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court