The High Court at Jodhpur dismissed the Criminal Misc Petition and stay petition as not pressed, granting liberty to the petitioners to raise defenses before the trial court during charge framing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Application Criminal No. 111 / 2018
In
S.B. Criminal Misc Petition No.3809/2017
1 Vinay Kumar S/o Shri Dariya Singh, aged about 60 years, R/o Suratpura, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Churu (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1 State of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nishant Motsara
For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.S. Rajpurohit, P.P.
For Complainant (s): Mr. Kaushal Gautam
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Order
06/03/2018
The matter comes up for consideration of application (APPLR No.111/2018) preferred on behalf of the petitioners with a prayer for early listing of the criminal misc. petition.
With the consent of the parties, the matter is finally heard.
After attempting to argue the matter for quite some time, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he does not want to press this criminal misc. petition, however, seeks liberty for the petitioners to raise all their defence before the trial court at the time of framing of charges.
(2 of 2)
[APPLR-111/2018]
Hence, this criminal misc. petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.
Stay petition also stands dismissed.
The application (APPLR No.111/2018) also stands dismissed.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J.
Taruna
Vinay Kumar
Mangi Ram
State of Rajasthan
Harish Chandra
VIJAY BISHNOI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
