Three connected criminal miscellaneous petitions are dismissed as infructuous because the underlying appeal was decided based on a compromise between the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 3030 / 2015
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
Connected With
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
(2 of 2)
----Petitioners
Versus
Respondents
_____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harish Jangid For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.S. Rajpurohit, P.P.
Mr. K.S. Charan
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
05/03/2018
Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that since the appeal pending before the appellate court has been decided on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties, these criminal misc. petitions have rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, these criminal misc. petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J.
Ms rathore
M/S Vaishali Distributors
Jitendra Sharma
State of Rajasthan
M/s. Varun Beverages Ltd.
Vijay Bishnoi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
