Dismissed

Rahul and Anr. v. State of Raj and Ors.

Rajasthan HC5 Jul 2018CRLMP/3449/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal miscellaneous petition before the Rajasthan High Court, Justice Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia dismissed the petition after the Public Prosecutor submitted that investigation was complete, the petitioners were found guilty, and remain evading arrest, warranting no judicial interference.

What did the court decide?

The petition was dismissed as devoid of merits due to completion of investigation and evading arrest.

Rahul and Anr. Vs State of Raj and Ors. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTPIAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 344912018

¶3

Rahul S/o Shri Rujdar B/c Mev, aged 23 years R/o Village Udaka Police Station Kaman District Bharatpur Rajasthan

¶4

Juber S/o Atar Khan B/c Mev, aged 22 years, R/o Village Semla Police Station Nagar District Bharatpur Rajasthan

¶5

Versus

¶6

h. " State Of Rajasthan Thro:ugh Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur

¶7

¶8

Stare< 8;' Rajasthan Through Public Prosecutor, Rajasthan .p>.,* ",'* 3

¶9

H~g:h""%ourt, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur, *- kg

¶10

s+t<+* "," Director General Of Police, Rajasthan Police, PHQ-Lal Kothi L I

¶11

Jaipur Rajasthan

¶12

Inspector Genepal of :bige, B,h,a:r$tpur Range Bharatpur. I, -* e -& Superindent of P'81icef Bharatpur Rajasthan Dy. Superindent Of Police, Kaman District Bharatpur Raj. ,iz" is .. iy. SHO Police ta6;$$gagafl.-@i$t??tharatpur ?A+:. - fl Rajasthan '6' .?%" ;; .< ** 8 ,&$$& Smt. Astuna aged about 27 years, R/o Udaka, Police Station Kaman District Bharatpur At Present Village Jatoli Policeii1Station Kaithwada District B ha rat p u r Ra j a ~~~$&&&&.&i$& ,-., .$,;" ,.;d,b$t ,,?..i ;&?$, (i:, _-I)RCC_ . -x,il..-" - w.i, ~m-3 **ex"** . P~P* ! %%% p$.% '*y$;~$ b ----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : Mr:.DD Kharidelwal For Respondent(s) : .Mr. Prakash Thakuriya PP " " ,* 'E ,-1 h 2 .3--

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA

¶15

Order

¶16

05/07/2018

¶17

The learned Public Prosecutor on instructions from Rai Singh Beniwal, Dy. S.P., Kama, has submitted that the investigation is complete and during investigation, the petitioners have been found guilty of the offences. It is submitted Ghat the

¶18

charge-sheet could not be filed as the petitioners are evading arrest.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor further submitted that the charge-sheet shall be filed under Section 299 Cr.P.C. within three weeks from today.

¶20

In view of the statement made by the learned Public Prosecutor, no interference is warranted and the present petition A. " I being devoid of me~its, is, dismissed.

¶21

(KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA),]

Rahul and Anr. v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul and Anr. v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Golyaram Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Hariram Vs State of Raj and Anr.

Vikki Chaura Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Meetha Lal Vs Smt Santra

Smt Pooja Sharma and and Anr. Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Ram Sharan @ Pappuram S/O Mohar Singh B/C Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan