Disposed

Smt Pooja Sharma and and Anr. v. State of Raj and Ors.

Rajasthan HC5 Jul 2018CRLMP/3432/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A High Court bench disposed of a petition seeking police protection for a newly married couple facing threats from those opposing the marriage. The court directed the SHO to ensure vigilance without adjudicating on the marriage's validity or age.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to the Station House Officer, Police Station, Raghunathgarh, Sikar, to ensure necessary vigil that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners.

Smt Pooja Sharma and and Anr. Vs State of Raj and… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3432/2018

¶3

Smt Pooja Sharma And And Anr

----Petitioners

Versus

State Of Raj And Ors

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakash Thakuriya, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA

¶10

Order

¶11

05/07/2018

¶12

Instant petition has been preferred on behalf of petitioners/ newly married couple praying interalia that a direction be issued to the respondents No.1 and 4 to protect them, as they apprehend danger to their life and liberty at the hands of those, who are opposed to the marriage.

¶13

Newly married couple is present in person. They have been identified by Mr. Anil Kumar Yadav, Advocate.

¶14

Smt. Pooja Sharma, petitioner No.1 present in person has stated that she is aged twenty one years and she is a student of B.A.-II Year. She further stated that she had performed marriage with petitioner No.2, namely Sh. Ravindra Kumawat according to her own free-will & accord and is living happily with him as a wife.

¶15

After hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, as well as, the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State, and going through the contents of the instant petition,

¶16

[CRLMP-3432/2018]

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

this Court is of the view that nobody can be permitted to take law

¶19

in his own hands merely because marriage is not acceptable.

¶20

Consequently, the present petition stands disposed of,

¶21

by issuing direction to the Station House Officer, Police Station, Raghunathgarh, Sikar(Raj.), to ensure necessary vigil that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of those, who are opposed to the marriage.

¶22

The above said order has been passed without determining the age and validity of the marriage of petitioners on the ground that those, who are opposed to the marriage, cannot cause harm to anybody.

¶23

Upon disposal of main petition, stay application, filed therewith does not survives and the same is also disposed of.

¶24

(KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA),J

¶25

Heena/82

Smt Pooja Sharma and and Anr. v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Pooja Sharma and and Anr. v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Golyaram Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Hariram Vs State of Raj and Anr.

Vikki Chaura Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Meetha Lal Vs Smt Santra

Rahul and Anr. Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Ram Sharan @ Pappuram S/O Mohar Singh B/C Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan