Single-line order dismissing a petition as infructuous because the accused had already been acquitted by the trial court, a fact unknown to the petitioner's counsel.
Petition dismissed. Instant petition has become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2088/2015
Sumit Taneja Son of Shri Sarandas, by caste Sindhi, Resident of A-10, Indrapuri, Agra, Police Station Agra, Janpad, Agra.
----Petitioner
Versus
Respondent-Complainant
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogesh Singhal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ram Ratan Gurjar, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G R MOOLCHANDANI
Order
07/08/2018
Information sent by Judicial Magistrate Weir vide letter No.313 dated 03.08.2018 reveals that accused has already been acquitted by the trial court on 08.01.2016 but learned counsel for the petitioner is not aware about this fact.
In view of above, instant petition has since become infructuous, hence, dismissed.
(G R MOOLCHANDANI),J
JKP/M-24
Sumit Taneja
State Of Rajasthan
Radhey Shyam
G R MOOLCHANDANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
