Suresh v. State of Rajasthan through Pp
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular bail application filed under Section 439 CrPC. Court found the case serious due to robbery and firearm use. Bail denied.
Regular bail application filed under Section 439 CrPC. Court found the case serious due to robbery and firearm use. Bail denied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 2)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 6934/2018
Suresh S/o Shri Phoolchand B/c Yadav, R/o Dhani Ramsingh Wali Tan Sirohi Police Station Neemkathana District Sikar Raj. At Present In District Jail Dausa
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan through P.P.
----Respondent __________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. K.K. Bhinda For Respondent : Mr. R.S. Raghav, P.P.
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Order
10/08/2018
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking regular bail in F.I.R. No. 87/2018 registered at Police Station Sikandra, District Dausa for offence under Section 395 Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3/25 of Arms Act, 1959.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 13.04.2018. Challan has already been presented in the court.
Learned state counsel, has opposed the petition and has submitted that the petitioner has been duly identified in the test identification parade by the complainant.
As per the prosecution story, petitioner and his coaccused had entered the shop of the complainant and had
(2 of 2)
looted liquor bottles and cash lying in the safe. It is also the case of the complainant that the accused had fired and had kept the firearm on the temple of the complainant before looting the shop. Petitioner has been identified in the test identification parade by the complainant.
Keeping in view the seriousness of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, no ground for grant of bail to him is made out.
Dismissed.
(SABINA)J.
Mohita/1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner accused of robbery and firearm offences.
Whether the petitioner has established valid grounds for bail despite the seriousness of the allegations.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Suresh S/o Shri Phoolchand B/c Yadav
State of Rajasthan
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court