Single judge bench rejected an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., finding no case for grant as the petitioner was named in an FIR for cheating where the complainant's daughter had fled after the petitioner's family took money for marriage.
The anticipatory bail application was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 5611/2018
Kasam S/o Hazar Khan B/c Mev, R/o Ranjeet Nagar, 60 Feet Road, Alwar (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Azad Ahmed For Respondent(s) : Mr.R.R.Singh Rathore,PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Judgment / Order
16/05/2018
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
teekam/37
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in the present facts?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kasam S/o Hazar Khan B/c Mev
State Of Rajasthan Through P.p
PANKAJ BHANDARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
