Jagdish v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
</
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to file a fresh bail application before the trial court after recording of statements of Investigating/Seizer Officer.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 5534/2018
Jagdish S/o Shri Ratiram, By Caste Nayak , R/o Ward No. 4, Jakharanwali, Tehsil Pilibanga, District Hanumangarh Raj. At Present Lodged At District Jail Hanumangarh
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J.S. Bhaleria For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Order
19/11/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner, without arguing on merits, has submitted that he does not want to press this criminal misc. bail application. However, seeks liberty for the petitioner to file fresh bail application before the trial court after recording of statements of Investigating/Seizer Officer.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal miscellaneous bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. should be allowed given the petitioner did not argue on merits.
Whether the petitioner can be granted liberty to file a fresh bail application before the trial court after recording of statements.
Whether the criminal miscellaneous bail application, being not pressed, should be dismissed with liberty to approach the trial court subsequently.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JAGDISH S/O SHRIRATIRAM
- respondent
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Coram
VIJAY BISHNOI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/5534/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court