In this bail application, the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur heard counsel for the petitioners seeking anticipatory bail. The learned justice held that he was not inclined to grant the prayer. Consequently, the application filed under Section 438 CrPC was dismissed.
Anticipatory bail was not granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 4940/2018
----Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashok Upadhayay, PP Mr. Rajendra Singh Charan, for the complainant
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
19/11/2018
Having heard learned counsel for the parties, I am not
inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
Hence, this bail application filed under Section 438 CrPC is
dismissed.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
ms rathore
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Praveen Kumar Mahiya
Gopal Ram
The State Of Rajasthan
Vijay Bishnoi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
