In a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. regarding an offence under Section 376 IPC, the court considered the delay in filing the FIR. The court deemed it proper to allow the bail application.
Bail allowed upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 5456/2018
Nitin Saini S/o Shri Moolchand B/c Mali, R/o House No. D 26 Ballabhbari Gumanpura Kota, Raj. (At Present Confined At Central Jail, Kota).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through Pp.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Rahim Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Order
07/05/2018
Mahaveer Nagar Kota for offence under Section 376 of I.P.C.
is a married lady aged 27 years. There is delay of more than two months in lodging of F.I.R.
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-5456/2018]
that accused petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Amit/47
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a FIR registered under Section 376 of IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nitin Saini
State Of Rajasthan
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
