Allowed

Mubarik Ali v. Sushil Kumar Poddar

Rajasthan HC5 May 2018CRLLA/28/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court granted leave to the appellant to file a special leave petition (SLP) under Article 136 of the Constitution challenging the impugned order of Inquest Court, GS Medical College, Ghaziabad, framing charges against him under Section 342, 347 read with 348 of BNSS. The leave was granted in view of the public interest and prima facie grounds.

What did the court decide?

Permission was granted to file the special leave petition (SLP) within 30 days from the receipt of the petition copy.

Mubarik Ali Vs Sushil Kumar Poddar — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqjA

¶3

%% vkns'k %%

¶4

S.B. Cri. Leave to Appeal No.-28/2018

¶5

Mubarik Ali

¶6

Vs.

¶7

Sushil Kumar Poddar

¶8

%% mifLFkr %%

¶9

ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh

¶10

vihykFkhZ ds vf/koDrk Jh vadq'k 'kekZ dh vksj ls vf/koDrk Jh gseUr Vsyj izR;FkhZ ds vf/koDrk Jh iou 'kekZA

¶11

%% vkns'k %% 5-5-2018

¶12

U;k;ky; }kjk %&

¶13

v/khuLFk U;k;ky;] U;kf;d eftLVªsV] >qU>quq }kjk izdj.k la[;k& 268@2015 ¼lh vkbZ ,l uEcj 188@2015½ esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukafdr 26-10-2017] ftlds rgr izR;FkhZ& vfHk;qDr dks vkjksfir vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 138 ,u vkbZ ,DV ls nks"keqDr fd;k x;k gS] ds fo:) vihykFkhZ&ifjoknh dh vksj ls vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk is'k dh xbZ gSA

¶14

vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk nsjh ls izLrqr djus ds dze esa vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr /kkjk 5 fe;kn vf/kfu;e ds izkFkZuk i=

¶15

¶16

esa of.kZr dkj.kksa o vk/kkjksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, /kkjk 5 fe;kn vf/kfu;e dk izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS ,oa vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk dks fe;kn esa ekuk tkrk gSA

¶17

cgl lquh xbZA ;ksX; vf/koDrk ifjoknh dk dFku jgk fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; ls Li"V :i ls izdV gksrk gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us fookfnr pSd ds vuknfjr gksus ds i'pkr~ ifjokn dks 15 fnu ds i;Zolku ls iwoZ izLrqr gksuk ekuk tkdj okn gSrqd mRiUu ugha gksuk rFkk vfHk;qDr&izR;FkhZ ds fo:) vijk/k xfBr ugha gksuk ekuk gS] tcfd ,slh dksbZ fLFkfr i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ls Li"V ugha gSa rFkk ekeys esa dkuwuh fcUnw vUrofyZr gSA vr% bl vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk Lohdkj fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA

¶18

fopkj fd;k x;kA vk{ksfir fu.kZ; dk voyksdu

¶19

fd;k x;kA

¶20

izdj.k esa miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ;ksX; vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ }kjk izdj.k dh iks"k.kh;rk ds fcUnw ds dze esa tks rdZ U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr fd, x;s gSa] mudh jks'kuh esa izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izFken`"V;k izLrqr vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶21

ifj.kker% vihykFkhZ&ifjoknh dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkrh gS ,oa vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk dks fu;fer vihy ds :i esa ntZ fd;k tk,A

¶22

¶23

vfHk;qDr&izR;FkhZ ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk dks funsZf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd os vkxkeh rkjh[k is'kh fnukad 5-7-2018 dks U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr j[ksaA

¶24

¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr

¶25

ts ,l iaokj@5 mijksDr fu.kZ;@vkns'k Hkkjr ljdkj dk jkti= la[;k&1] fnukad 02 tuojh] 1999 esa izdkf'kr x`g ea=ky;] jktHkk"kk foHkkx ds ladYi@uksfVfQds'ku ds rgr lacaf/kr Hkk"kk ¼fgUnh½ esa [kqys U;k;ky; eas fy[kk;k x;kA

Mubarik Ali v. Sushil Kumar Poddar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mubarik Ali v. Sushil Kumar Poddar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Yadav and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Baljeet Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Budh Singh Vs Kana Rama and Anr.

Geeta Kumari Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Khushnuma and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Kishan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp