Allowed

Shekh Salim v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC8 May 2018CRLMB/5064/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in a case involving alleged drug offences under the NDPS Act, subject to personal bond, sureties, and conditions regarding movement and non-interference.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed on furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each, conditioned upon appearance before IO within one month, availability for interrogation, and not

Shekh Salim Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 5064/2018

¶3

Shekh Salim S/o Shri Ahmad Bux B/c Muslim, R/o Giwariyon Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 7, Parbatsar, Distt. Nagaur

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devanshu Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.R. Singh Rathore, PP.

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

¶10

Order

¶11

08/05/2018

¶12

Petitioner has filed this miscellaneous bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶13

F.I.R. No. 18/2018 was registered at Police Station G.R.P. Ajmer for offence under Sections 8/20 of NDPS Act during the course of investigation added section 8/29 of NDPS Act.

¶14

It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the recovered contraband is less than small quantity. It was recovered from the co-accused and considering his interrogation note, Police wants to arrest the petitioner.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

I have considered the contentions.

¶17

Considering the arguments put forth by counsel for the petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the anticipatory bail

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-5064/2018]

application.

The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station G.R.P. Ajmer in F.I.R. No.18/2018 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to his satisfaction on the following conditions :-

¶22

(i). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶23

(iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶24

However, petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer within one month from today and submit bail bonds, failing which the anticipatory bail application shall stand dismissed without reference to the Bench and Police would be free to arrest the petitioner.

¶25

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

¶26

Amit/43

Shekh Salim v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shekh Salim v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nitin Saini Vs State of Rasjasthan

Mohammad Safiq Vs Miss Heena and Ors.

Man Singh Yadav Vs Shri Ashim Khurana Chairman S S C

Jaikam Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Hatturam and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Jagdish Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp