Appellant failed to appear on the second call; no process fee or notices were filed for service on respondent no.1 and 2. The High Court dismissed the appeal.
The appeal is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO. 2512/2005
Mohamad Shafiq Khan
----Appellant
Versus
Miss Heena & Ors.
----Respondents
__________________________________________ For Appellant : None For Respondent no.3 : Mr. Amarnath Pareek
__________________________________________ HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Order
07/05/2018
Even on the second call, none has appeared on behalf of
the appellant nor the process fee/notices have been filed to effect service on respondent no.1 & 2.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
(SABINA)J.
Mohita/3
Mohamad Shafiq Khan
Miss Heena & Ors.
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
