Allowed

Naresh Kumar and Anr. v. State

Rajasthan HC9 May 2018CRLMB/4376/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed bail to accused petitioners Naresh Kumar and Jitendra Kumar arrested in connection with an FIR under various IPC and PDPP Act sections. The court granted bail contingent upon execution of a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioners on bail with personal bond and sureties before the trial court for their appearance until trial completion.

Naresh Kumar and Anr. Vs State — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 4376 / 2018

¶3

Naresh Kumar Son of Mangla Ram, Aged About 25 Years, By Caste Meghwal, Resident of Jodwas, Tehsil Raniwara, Distt Jalore.

¶4

Jitendra Kumar Son of Chaggna Ram, Aged About 33 Years, By Caste Meghwal, Resident of Jodwas, Tehsil Raniwara, Distt Jalore. (Lodged in Sub Jail, Bhinmal)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan

¶7

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. KL Chauhan

¶8

For Respondent(s) : Mr. KV Vyas, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG Judgment / Order

¶10

09/05/2018

¶11

The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.53/2018 of Police Station Raniwara, Distt. Jalore, for the offence punishable under Section 147, 148, 332, 333, 353, 336, 307, 36/149 of IPC and Section 3 of PDPP Act. They have preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶12

Counsel for the petitioners submits that similar situated coaccused has already been granted bail by this Court. The case of the present petitioner is also similar. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the accused-petitioners are in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioners.

¶13

(2 of 2)

¶14

[CRLMB-4376/2018]

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available.

¶17

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶18

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners 1. Naresh Kumar S/o Shri Mangla Ram, 2. Jitendra Kumar S/o Shri Chaggna Ram, be released on bail in connection with FIR No.53/2018 of Police Station Raniwara, Distt. Jalore, provided each of them execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶19

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J.

¶20

Amit/64

Naresh Kumar and Anr. v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naresh Kumar and Anr. v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamlesh Vs State

Hanuman Ram Vs State

Arman Hussain Pathan Vs State

Rodu Banzara Vs State

Naresh Kumar and Anr. Vs State

Moin-Ul-Haq Vs State