Allowed

Naresh Kumar and Anr. v. State

Rajasthan HC9 May 2018CRLMB/4375/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

hcjaodhpur allowed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. filed by two accused petitioners. The petitioners were arrested in connection with a public prosecution case involving multiple offences including murder attempts and affray. The high court granted bail subject to the execution of a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioners on bail via personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- each with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Naresh Kumar and Anr. Vs State — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 4375 / 2018

¶3

Naresh Kumar S/o Shri Mangala Ram, B/c Meghwal, Resident of Jodwas, Tehsil Raniwada, District Jalore.

¶4

Jitendra Kumar S/o Shri Chagana Ram, B/c Meghwal, Resident of Jodwas, Tehsil Raniwada, District Jalore. (In Judicial Custody At District Jail, Jalore)

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Rajasthan

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. JS Choudhary, Sr. Adv. Assisted by

¶10

Mr. Tarun Dhaka

¶11

For Respondent(s) : Mr. KV Vyas, PP

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶13

Judgment / Order

¶14

09/05/2018

¶15

The petitioners have been arrested in connection with CR Case No.53/2018 of Police Station Raniwada, for the offence punishable under Section 147, 148, 332, 333, 353, 336, 307, 436/149 of IPC and Section 3 of PDPP Act. They have preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶16

Counsel for the petitioners submits that similar situated coaccused has already been granted bail by this Court. The case of the present petitioner is also similar. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the accused-petitioners are in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-4375/2018]

¶19

concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioners.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶21

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available.

¶22

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶23

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners 1. Naresh Kumar S/o Shri Mangala Ram, 2. Jitendra Kumar S/o Shri Chagana Ram, be released on bail in connection with CR Case No.53/2018 of Police Station Raniwada, provided each of them execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶24

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J.

¶25

Amit/63

Naresh Kumar and Anr. v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naresh Kumar and Anr. v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamlesh Vs State

Hanuman Ram Vs State

Arman Hussain Pathan Vs State

Rodu Banzara Vs State

Naresh Kumar and Anr. Vs State

Moin-Ul-Haq Vs State