Hanuman Ram v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Jodhpur dismissed the petitioner's application seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., finding that no case was made out for its grant.
What did the court decide?
Application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. dismissed.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 4233 / 2018
Hanuman Ram S/o Late Purkha Ram, By Caste Bishnoi, Resident of Neda Nagar, Moolraj, Tehsil Lohawat District Jodhpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
The State of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Khileri
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Deepak Choudhary,PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
08/05/2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a case is made out for the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Hanuman Ram S/o Late Purkha Ram
- respondent
The State of Rajasthan
Coram
Manoj Kumar Garg
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/4233/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court