Partly allowed

Jitendra Singh Rajawat and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC12 Apr 2018CRLMB/3834/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed bail to petitioners in six criminal bail applications. Petitioners in four applications were not named in the FIR, leading to grant of bail, while petitioners in two applications, who were named as witnesses, had bail rejected.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed for petitioners not named in FIR on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each; bail rejected for petitioners named as witnesses to be filed again post charge-sheet.

Jitendra Singh Rajawat and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan… — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 3834/2018

¶3

Jitendra Singh Rajawat Son Of Bharat Singh, By Caste Rajput, Resident Of House No. E566, Mukti Dham, R.k. Puram, Kota; Presently Resident Of E-99, R.k. Puram, Kota (Rajasthan). (Accused Persons Currently Confined At Central Jail, Kota)

¶4

Kanhiya Lal Saini Son Of Basanti Lal Saini, By Caste Mali, Resident Of Mali Pada, Nanta, Kota (Rajasthan). (Accused Person Currently Confined At Central Jail, Kota)

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 3836/2018

¶11

Harish Meena S/o Bhomaram Meena B/c Meena, R/o House No.3 Dh 424 Rangwadi, Kota, Raj. (Accused Currently Confined At Central Jail, Kota).

¶12

----Petitioner

¶13

Versus

¶14

State Of Rajasthan Through Pp.

¶15

----Respondent

¶16

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 3925/2018

¶17

Devraj Gurjar S/o Shri Jawahar Lal B/c Gurjar, R/o Village Nanta, Tehsil Ladpura Distt. Kota (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota)

¶18

----Petitioner

¶19

Versus

¶20

State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.

¶21

----Respondent

¶22

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 4211/2018

¶23

Pappu S/o Shri Kalu Lal B/c Gurjar, R/o Keshorai Patan, Distt. Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Distt. Jail, Kota)

----Petitioner

Versus

(2 of 4)

[CRLMB-3834/2018]

State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.

¶29

----Respondent

¶30

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 4212/2018

¶31

Satendra Kumar Rathore S/o Shri Bajarang Lal Rathore, B/c Teli, R/o Pipli Chouraha, Nanta Kota (Raj.) (Presently confined in central Jail Kota)

¶32

----Petitioner

¶33

Versus

¶34

State Of Rajasthan Through Pp

¶35

----Respondent

¶36

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 4568/2018

¶37

Bhanwar Lal S/o Shri Dhanna Lal B/c Meghwal, R/o Near Deva Ji Mandir, Keshorai Patan, Distt. Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Distt. Jail, Kota)

¶38

----Petitioner

¶39

Versus

¶40

State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.

¶41

----Respondent

¶42

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Choudhary Mr. Liyakat Ali Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar Mr. Anil Kumar Upman For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP

¶43

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

¶44

Judgment / Order

¶45

12/04/2018

¶46

Petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.

¶47

F.I.R. No.314/2017 was registered at Police Station Borkheda, District Kota for offence under Sections 420, 406 467, 468, 471, 120-B of I.P.C.

¶48

It is contended by counsel for the petitioners that petitioners

¶49

(3 of 4)

¶50

[CRLMB-3834/2018]

¶51

in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Applications No.3834/2018, 3836/2018, 3925/2018 and 4212/2018 are not named in the F.I.R.

¶52

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed these bail applications. His contention is that petitioners in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Applications No.4211/2018 and 4568/2018 are named in the F.I.R. and they are attesting witnesses to fake power of attorney got prepared by Kalu Ram. It is also contended that the matter is still at the stage of investigation.

¶53

I have considered the contentions.

¶54

Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the petitioners, bail applications No.3834/2018, 3836/2018, 3925/2018 and 4212/2018 are allowed and Bail Applications No.4211/2018 and 4568/2018 are rejected.

¶55

Bail Applications No.3834/2018, 3836/2018, 3925/2018 and 4212/2018 are accordingly allowed and Bail Applications No.4211/2018 and 4568/2018 are rejected and it is directed that accused petitioners in Bail Applications No.3834/2018, 3836/2018, 3925/2018 and 4212/2018 shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/(Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶56

Petitoiners in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Applications

¶57

(4 of 4) [CRLMB-3834/2018]

¶58

No.4211/2018 and 4568/2018 would be free to move fresh bail

¶59

applications after filing of the charge-sheet.

¶60

A copy of this order be placed in connected files.

¶61

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

¶62

Arti/64-69

Jitendra Singh Rajawat and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendra Singh Rajawat and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahadev Prashad Soni Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Murari Lal Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Lekhraj and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Sunita Kumari Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Dhanraj Suman Vs State of Rajsthan through P P

Nand Kishore Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp