This court rejected the petitioners' application for anticipatory bail. However, the court directed the lower authorities not to arrest the petitioners till 07.05.2018 while they surrender to file a regular bail application.
Direction given not to arrest the petitioners till 07.05.2018 in connection with FIR No. 435/2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 3552 / 2018
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shreekant Verma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. AS Rathore, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
24/04/2018
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.
After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, hence this bail application is rejected.
However, the petitioners are permitted to surrender before the concerned trial court on or before 07.05.2018 and file an application for bail under Section 437 Cr.P.C. and it is expected from the concerned trial court that the bail application will be decided on the same day sympathetically considering the fact that the petitioners are ladies.
Till 07.05.2018, the petitioners shall not be arrested in connection with FIR No.435/2016, P.S. Jawahar Nagar, District Sri Ganganagar.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG) J.
ms/-33
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners.
Whether a stay order against arrest for the pending trial is appropriate.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Poonam D/o Shri Krishan Kumar
Rameti Wife of Sh Suresh Kumar
Manoj Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
