Allowed

Rohit Kumar v. State

Rajasthan HC4 May 2018CRLMB/3286/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for an offence under the NDPS Act, the single-bench High Court at Jodhpur granted bail to the petitioner who was in judicial custody. The court found no reason to stay the relief, directing the release upon execution of a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to the accused-petitioner on execution of a personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs. 1,00,000/- each.

Rohit Kumar Vs State — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 3286 / 2018

¶3

Rohit Kumar S/o Shri Surendra Kumar, by caste Arora, resident of Ward No.7 Sadul Sahar, District Sri Ganganagar, Raj.

¶4

(at present lodged in Central Jail, Sri Ganganagar)

----Petitioner

Versus

State of Rajasthan

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Bishnoi

¶10

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Deepak Choudhary, PP

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶12

Judgment / Order

¶13

04/05/2018

¶14

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.92/2018 of Police Station Sadulsahar, Sri Ganganagar, for the offence punishable under Section 8/15 of NDPS Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶15

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the recovered contraband is below commercial quantity. Challan of the case has already been filed by the police and no investigation is pending against the petitioner. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-3286/2018]

¶19

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Rohit Kumar S/o Shri Surendra Kumar, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.92/2018 of Police Station Sadulsahar, Sri Ganganagar, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶21

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG) J.

¶22

Hanuman/11

Rohit Kumar v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit Kumar v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prahald Ram Vs State

Babu Nath Vs State

Rajendra Vs State

Suresh Kumar Vs State

Rohitash @ Ravi Vs State

Surjeet and Ors. Vs State