Allowed

Rajendra v. State

Rajasthan HC3 May 2018CRLMB/4182/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail application, the petitioner apprehended arrest for offences under IPC Sections 143, 341, 342, 323, and 308. The court considered arguments regarding his omission from the FIR and a co-accused being on bail, observing it was a fit case for bail.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; petitioner to be released on bail upon arrest upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 80,000 with two sureties of Rs. 40,000 each.

Rajendra Vs State — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 4182 / 2018

¶3

Rajendra Son of Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 30 Years, By Caste Bhat, Resident of Sonji Ki Dhani, Naya Gaon, Tehsil & District Pali.

----Petitioner

Versus

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shankar Singh Rajpurohit

¶8

For Respondent(s) : Mr. AS Rathore, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶10

Order

¶11

03/05/2018

¶12

This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.151/2018, Police Station Pali Kotwali, District Pali, for the offences under Section 143, 341, 342, 323, 308 of IPC.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has not been mentioned in the FIR and one of the co-accused namely Dhapu has already been enlarged on bail by this Court under Section 438 Cr.P.C, therefore no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner behind the bars for indefinite time. Thus, the petitioner may be released on anticipatory bail.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-4182/2018]

¶17

Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order.

¶18

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Rajendra Son of Bhanwar Lal, in connection with FIR No.151/2018, Police Station Pali Kotwali, District Pali, the petitioner shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.80,000/along with two sureties of Rs.40,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-

¶20

(i). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶21

(ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and

¶22

(iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶23

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG) J.

¶24

Hanuman/-35

Rajendra v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jasvinder Singh Vs State

Govind Vs State

Dinesh Vs State

Prahald Ram Vs State

Babu Nath Vs State

Suresh Kumar Vs State