Allowed

Vikas Upadhyay v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC21 Feb 2018CRLMB/2298/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge of Rajasthan High Court allowed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. regarding offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 471, and 120-B IPC, directing release on a personal bond with sureties upon arrest.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail to be released on bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each upon arrest, subject to standard conditions.

Vikas Upadhyay Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 2298 / 2018

¶3

Vikas Upadhyay S/o Yugraj B/c Brahmin R/o Plot No.58, Hira Nagar-A, Hirapura, Ajmer Road, Jaipur.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishwajeet Mantri for Mr. Sandeep Maheshwari

¶9

For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.R. Singh Rathore, P.P.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

¶11

Order

¶12

21/02/2018

¶13

Petitioner has filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶14

F.I.R. No. 773/2017 was registered at Police Station Kanota, Jaipur for offence under Sections 420, 406, 467, 471, 120-B of I.P.C.

¶15

It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that co-accused Rampratap Meena has been given benefit of anticipatory bail by this Court. There is delay of four years in lodging the F.I.R.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the anticipatory bail application.

¶17

I have considered the contentions.

¶18

Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the anticipatory bail

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-2298/2018]

application.

The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Kanota, Jaipur in F.I.R. No. 773/2017 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to his satisfaction on the following conditions :-

¶23

(i). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶24

(ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶25

(iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶26

(PANKAJ BHANDARI)J.

¶27

Amit/94

Vikas Upadhyay v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikas Upadhyay v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Banwari Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Gaurav Gandhi Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Surja through Lr Vs Surja through Lrs and Ors.

Shukhvir Singh Vs State of Raj and Anr.

Bhanwar Singh Vs the Director General of Police and Ors.

Chittarmal Mahant Vs B.O.R.Ajmer and Ors.