Allowed

Banwari v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC20 Feb 2018CRLMB/1699/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court allowed an anticipatory bail application filed by Banwari S/o Betali B/c Tyagi under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in an FIR registered for offences under various IPC sections, directing the SHO for release upon furnishing surety.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; directed SHO to release on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each upon arrest.

Banwari Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 1699 / 2018

¶3

Banwari S/o Betali B/c Tyagi, R/o Village Maloni Khurd, Police Station Kolari, Distt. Dholpur.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan Through P.P.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dheeraj Singhal

¶9

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

¶11

Order

¶12

20/02/2018

¶13

Petitioner has filed this miscellaneous bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶14

F.I.R. No. 243/2017 was registered at Police Station Kolari District Dholpur for offence under Sections 143, 323, 325, 341, 504, 506 of I.P.C. and later on Section 308 I.P.C. was added.

¶15

It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that allegation against the petitioner is of causing injury on hand of Kaluti. The injury caused on hand is simple in nature. Co-accused have been given regular bail by this Court and custodial interrogation of petitioner is not required.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶17

I have considered the contentions.

¶18

Considering the arguments put forth by counsel for the petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the anticipatory bail

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-1699/2018]

application.

The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Kolari District Dholpur in F.I.R. No. 243/2017 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to his satisfaction on the following conditions :-

¶23

(i). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶24

(ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶25

(iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶26

(PANKAJ BHANDARI), J.

¶27

Amit/56

Banwari v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Banwari v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhoori Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

Rahul Grover Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Gopal Lal and Others Vs Babu Lal and Othres

Rajesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Ramesh Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Santosh Kumar and Ors. Vs State of Raj and Anr.