Allowed

Lekhraj Mittal v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC20 Feb 2018CRLMB/2130/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in view of an FIR registered for cheating and forgery. Bail conditions include appearance for interrogation, preserving evidence, and not leaving India without permission.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to a bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each and adherence to specific conditions.

Lekhraj Mittal Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 2130 / 2018

¶3

Lekhraj Mittal S/o Sh. Brij Mohan Mittal, B/c Mahajan, Aged About 36 Years, R/o B-262, 10 B-scheme, Gopalpura Bye Pass, Jaipur.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan Through PP.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Goswami

¶9

For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.R. Singh Rathore, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

¶11

Judgment / Order

¶12

20/02/2018

¶13

Petitioner has filed this miscellaneous bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶14

F.I.R. No.71/2007 was registered at Police Station Murlipura (West) District Jaipur for offence under Sections 447 of I.P.C. (later on Section 420, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 120-B of I.P.C. added by Investigating Officer).

¶15

It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was bonifide purchaser. Seller has been given benefit of bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶17

I have considered the contentions.

¶18

Considering the arguments put forth by counsel for the petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[CRLMB-2130/2018]

¶21

The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Murlipura (West) District Jaipur in F.I.R. No.71/2007 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to his satisfaction on the following conditions :-

¶22

(i). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶23

(ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶24

(iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶25

(PANKAJ BHANDARI), J.

¶26

Arti/91

Lekhraj Mittal v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lekhraj Mittal v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhoori Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

Rahul Grover Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Gopal Lal and Others Vs Babu Lal and Othres

Rajesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Ramesh Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Santosh Kumar and Ors. Vs State of Raj and Anr.