The High Court of Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur dismissed a Criminal Misc. Cancellation of Bail application No. 59/2018 held by the petitioner for want of prosecution as no representative appeared on the second call.
Discontinued and dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Cancellation of Bail Application No. 59/2018
Rajkumar S/o Shri Ramkhiladi Meena
----Petitioner
Versus
Chenta @ Chetram S/o Moolchand & Ors.
----Respondents
__________________________________________ For Petitioner : None For Respondents : Mr. Jitendra Shrimali, P.P. For Complainant : Mr. Umesh Vyas
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Order
04/09/2018
Even on the second call, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (SABINA)J.
Mohita/3
Rajkumar S/o Shri Ramkhiladi Meena
Chenta @ Chetram S/o Moolchand & Ors.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
