Application allowed to correct an order dated 23.7.2018 regarding the proper appearance of the Advocate for the respondent.
Order dated 23.7.2018 corrected to reflect that Mr. N.K. Jain, Advocate appeared for respondent no.3 instead of Mr. Lokesh Parihar.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Application No. 194/2018
IN
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 2378/2018
Chetan Sharma S/o Kajod Mal Sharma
----Applicant
Versus
Veerendra Singh & Ors.
----Respondents
__________________________________________ For Applicant : Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain
For Appellants : Mr. K.N. Tiwari
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Order
04/09/2018
Heard.
Application is allowed for the reasons stated therein.
Order dated 23.7.2018 is corrected to the extent that Mr. N.K. Jain, Advocate had appeared on behalf of respondent no.3 instead of Mr. Lokesh Parihar, Advocate.
(SABINA), J
Mohita/71
Chetan Sharma
Veerendra Singh
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
